|
|
Post by Papa B on Dec 9, 2013 0:47:31 GMT
There was no description under this header, so I feel it's only fair to ask what "Law" you are referring to.
|
|
|
|
Post by neilos on Dec 9, 2013 19:21:25 GMT
Should imagine the heading is in reference to Natural Law as outlined by Silver Birch:-)
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 9, 2013 19:27:28 GMT
Law 10 Mar 2008 - In it's fifty seven year history, the Fraudulent Mediums Act, 1951 has only ever been used to prosecute about half a dozen people......just thought it may make an interesting topic on the forum, for those who may wish to discuss it
|
|
|
|
Post by neilos on Dec 9, 2013 19:34:32 GMT
Oops lol!
|
|
|
|
Post by fizzer on Dec 9, 2013 19:40:50 GMT
That I WOULD be interested to peruse for others for many reasons thankyou fab...
|
|
|
|
Post by Papa B on Dec 10, 2013 18:32:49 GMT
Law 10 Mar 2008 - In it's fifty seven year history, the Fraudulent Mediums Act, 1951 has only ever been used to prosecute about half a dozen people......just thought it may make an interesting topic on the forum, for those who may wish to discuss it According to Wikipedia, this was a law in England and Wales which prosecuted 5 people (all of them resulting in convictions) and was repealed on the 26 of May 2008 because of a New EU directive concerning consumer protection, though I can only assume that such was as a result of such regulation being contained within the new regulations. Is there a similar law in America? It seems that some mediums which have been proven to be fraudulent (some even by Spiritualist societies themselves) do not seem to be among the convictions, so it seems that the amount of convictions of the Law is not indicative necessarily of the truthfulness of the mediums who weren't prosecuted and convicted. |
|
